Port Facility Improvement and Vessel Call Dynamics: A Qualitative Analysis of Institutional and Infrastructure Constraints in a Regional Feeder Port
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/japk.v16i2.206Keywords:
port facilities, vessel calls, regional feeder port, port governanceAbstract
Regional feeder ports play a critical role in supporting logistics connectivity and regional economic growth; however, their performance is often constrained by limited facilities and governance issues. This study aims to examine the relationship between port facility conditions, vessel call dynamics, and institutional constraints affecting the development of a regional feeder port. A qualitative interpretative approach was employed, using field observations, in-depth interviews with port authorities and stakeholders, and document analysis. Data were analyzed through thematic reduction, categorization, and analytical interpretation. The findings reveal that low vessel calls are not primarily driven by insufficient demand but by inadequate core facilities such as channel depth, berth length, and cargo handling equipment. Furthermore, overlapping authorities and the absence of updated port master planning documents significantly hinder investment decision-making. This study highlights that port facility improvement must be preceded by institutional resolution to ensure effective and sustainable port development.
References
Barus, B. (2017). Analisis pengaruh fasilitas fisik terhadap volume kunjungan kapal di pelabuhan pengumpan regional. Jurnal Transportasi Laut, 19(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.25104/transla.v19i2.XXX
Brooks, M. R., & Cullinane, K. (2007). Devolution, port governance and port performance. Elsevier.
Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Keputusan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor KP 414 Tahun 2013 tentang Rencana Induk Pelabuhan Nasional (RIPN). Jakarta: Kemenhub RI.
Muslim, M. A. (2016). Tata kelola pelabuhan dan implikasinya terhadap kinerja pelayanan kepelabuhanan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik, 3(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.25292/j.mtl.v3i2.94
Notteboom, T. E. (2006). The time factor in liner shipping services. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100148
Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy & Management, 28(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830119197
Nurzanah, S. (2020). Pengaruh pengembangan fasilitas pelabuhan terhadap peningkatan arus kunjungan kapal. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Laut, 22(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.25104/jptl.v22i1.XXX
Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346323
Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Tongzon, J. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004
UNCTAD. (2019). Review of maritime transport 2019. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf
Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Awel Suryadi, Agus Leonard Togatorop

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



