Standard Truck Round Time Service Time in Improving Receiving Performance at PT. Terminal Peti Kemas Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/japk.v12i2.85Keywords:
truck round time service, receiving performanceAbstract
The aim of this study is to determine the standard truck round time (TRT) service time in improving receiving performance, identify the causes and impacts of TRT exceeding the standard set time. The research design used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Sources of data in this study are divided into primary data sources obtained from interviews, observations and literature studies and documentation of printed books, and journals . The result of this research is that the service quality at PT. Terminal Petikemas Surabaya is good because the dominant number of trucks on TRT is less than 30 minutes, although it can be indicated that there is a decrease in performance. This decline in performance is demonstrated by an increase in the number of trucks from 2019 to 2022 on TRT for more than 30 minutes. The causes of the TRT that exceeds the standard determination time are the density factor in the stacking field, the equipment factor, the human resource factor and the natural factor. The negative impact of TRT that exceeds the standard setting time is the disruption of loading and unloading activities, internal company losses and decreased customer loyalty. Suggestions that can be used in overcoming the TRT (Truck Round Time) problem are that good coordination is needed in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), improvisation from both human resources, systems and equipment as well as yard planners carrying out various plan innovations by shortening slots so that RTG movements are not too displacement length.
References
Ali, H. (2008). Marketing. Jakarta: PT Buku Kita.
Creswell, J. (2010). Pendekatan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
Cuadrado. (2004). Overview of interport competition: Issues and methods. Researchgate, hal. 106.
Daniel. (2016). Faktor Penyebab Tidak Tercapainya Sasaran Mutu (Truck Round Time) Kegiatan Delivery Pada PT. Mustika Alam Lestari.
Jakarta: Library STMT Trisakti.
Databoks. (2018). Triwulan I 2018, Perekonomian Sektor Logistik Rp 31 Triliun. Diambil kembali dari Databoks:
https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2018/06/07/triwulan-i-2018- perekonomian-sektor-logitik-rp-31-triliun
Dayan, A. (1986). Pengantar Metode Statistik. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Dephub. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan pasal 1 ayat (4) Nomer 14 Tahun 2007. Jakarta: Dephub.
Dephub. (2018). Standar Kinerja Pelayanan. Surabaya: Dephub.
Engkos. (2007). Jenis Petikemas. Dalam Engkos, Manajemen Perusahaan Pelayaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Furqon. (1997). Statistika Terapan untuk Penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Jamal, A. (2017). Analyzing the Benefit of Implementing Integrated DGPS and Terminal Operating System at Yard Terminal Surabaya.
Surabaya: Jatit.
Kemendag. (2002). Keputusan Direksi (Persero) Pelabuhan Indonesia II Nomer HK.56/2/25/PI.II-02 Tanggal 28 Juni 2002. Jakarta:
Kemendag.
Kosasih, E. (2012). Manajemen Perusahaan Pelayaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Kotler, P. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran, Edisi Ketiga Belas. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kramadibrata, S. (2002). Peti Kemas Masalah dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Fernando.
Kuncoro, M. (2009). Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis & Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM.
Manager. (2019, Maret 2). Truck Round Time. (M. B. Process, Pewawancara)
Martini, H. N. (1996). Penelitian Terapan. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nazir. (2013). Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Peraturan Undang Undang Nomer 25 tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomer
.
Pelindo. (2014). Peraturan Direksi PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia III (Persero) Nomer: PER.22.1/OS.0102/P.III. Surabaya: Pelindo III.
Pelindo. (2015). Peraturan General Manager PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia III Cabang Tanjung Perak Nomor: PER.2/05.0102/TPR–2015.
Surabaya: Pelindo III.
Rahim, R. (2017). Mitigasi Risiko Proses Bongkar Muat Petikemas (Studi Kasus di PT Terminal Petikemas Semarang). Surakarta: Digital
Library UNS.
Riduwan. (2004). Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung, Cetakan Pertama.
Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Setyadin. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Pratik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Shift. (2019, Februari 12). Perhitungan TRT. (S. M. TPS, Pewawancara)
Subandi. (1996). Manajemen Petikemas. Jakarta: Arcan.
Sudjatmiko. (1985). Pokok-Pokok Pelayaran Niaga. Dalam Sudjatmiko, Pokok-Pokok Pelayaran Niaga (hal. 13). Jakarta: Akademika
Pressindo.
Superintendent. (2022, Februari 20). Dampak TRT yang melebihi standar waktu penetapan. (Superintendent, Pewawancara)
Supranto. (2000). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
TPS. (2019). TPS Throughtput 2022. Diambil kembali dari TPS: http://www.tps.co.id/id-id/berita/latest-
news/listing/2021/02/08/10/02/tps-throughput-2021
TPS, G. M. (2022). Peratuan tata peletakan petikemas di lapangan penumpukan.Surabaya: General Manager TPS.
TPS, S. M. (2022, Februari 29). Perhitungan TRT. (S. M. TPS, Pewawancara)
TPS, S. M. (2022, Februari 22). Pentingnya TRT. (S. M. TPS, Pewawancara)
Wahyuni, S. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.
Yunani, A. (2017, April 10). Perkembangan Bisnis Logistik Indonesia. Supply Chain Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abdul Rohman Yunus, F. X. Adi Purwanto Nugroho, Revian Pradana Putra A. S.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
